RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (3)

RFC 4632, "Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan", August 2006

Source of RFC: grow (ops)

Errata ID: 2955
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Olivier Le Rigoleur
Date Reported: 2011-09-03
Verifier Name: ron bonica
Date Verified: 2011-09-09

Section 6.1 says:

 C2: 10.24.16.0/20       \ |    |  _10.24.12.0 - 10.24.15.0__  |    |
                          \|    | / C4: 10.24.12.0/20        \ |    |
                                                 ~~~~~

It should say:

 C2: 10.24.16.0/20       \ |    |  _10.24.12.0 - 10.24.15.0__  |    |
                          \|    | / C4: 10.24.12.0/22        \ |    |

Notes:

~Should be 10.24.12.0/22 as described just above

Errata ID: 3485
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Markus Falb
Date Reported: 2013-02-18
Verifier Name: RonBonica
Date Verified: 2013-02-18

Section 2 says:

three classes of networks: Class A
(most significant address bits '00'), with 128 possible networks each
and 16777216 end systems

It should say:

three classes of networks: Class A
(most significant address bit '0'), with 128 possible networks each
and 16777216 end systems

Notes:

MSB bits ’00’ would mean that only 6 bits are available for the network part and this would mean only 64 CLASS A networks.

Errata ID: 4194
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: larry
Date Reported: 2014-12-04
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2015-07-19

Section 5.3 says:

 Systems that process route announcements must be able to verify that
   information that they receive is acceptable according to policy
   rules.  Implementations that filter route advertisements must allow
   masks or prefix lengths in filter elements.  Thus, filter elements
   that formerly were specified as

      accept 172.16.0.0
      accept 172.25.120.0.0
      accept 172.31.0.0
      deny 10.2.0.0
      accept 10.0.0.0

It should say:

 Systems that process route announcements must be able to verify that
   information that they receive is acceptable according to policy
   rules.  Implementations that filter route advertisements must allow
   masks or prefix lengths in filter elements.  Thus, filter elements
   that formerly were specified as

      accept 172.16.0.0
      accept 172.25.120.0
      accept 172.31.0.0
      deny 10.2.0.0
      accept 10.0.0.0

Notes:

the second network address has 40 bits (5 groups of numbers instead of 4-32 bits).

172.25.120.0.0

Report New Errata



Advanced Search