RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (2)
RFC 4619, "Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Frame Relay over Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Networks", September 2006
Source of RFC: pwe3 (int)
Errata ID: 41
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-01
Verifier Name: Andrew G. Malis
Date Verified: 2006-11-01
Section 1 says:
The main functions required to support frame relay PW by a Provider Edge (PE) include:
It should say:
The main functions required to support frame relay PWs by a Provider Edge (PE) include:
Notes:
from pending
Errata ID: 817
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-01
Verifier Name: Andrew G. Malis
Date Verified: 2006-11-01
(1) [[posted separately.]] (2) improper wording (mismatch with what follows) On page 3, the last paragraph above Figure 1 says: v vvv The following figure describes the reference models that are derived from [RFC3985] to support the frame relay PW emulated services. It should say: | The following figure describes the reference model that is derived from [RFC3985] to support the frame relay PW emulated services. (3) typo (missing article) Within Section 5, the 2nd list item on page 6 says: - Frame relay Local Management Interface (LMI) is terminated locally in the PE connected to the frame relay attachment circuit. It should say: | - The Frame relay Local Management Interface (LMI) is terminated locally in the PE connected to the frame relay attachment circuit. (4) missing article The last bullet within Section 7.2, near the top of page 8, says: - Payload The payload field corresponds to X.36/X.76 frame relay frame information field with the following components removed: bit/byte stuffing, frame relay header, and FCS. [...] It should say: - Payload | The payload field corresponds to an X.36/X.76 frame relay frame information field with the following components removed: bit/byte stuffing, frame relay header, and FCS. [...] (5) typos/grammar The last bulleted item in Section 7.6.2, on top of page 12, says: vvvvvv | - Otherwise, if the payload is longer, then the length specified in | the control word padding characters are removed according to the length field. ^ It should say: v v | - Otherwise, if the payload is longer than the length specified in | the control word, padding characters are removed according to the length field. ^ (6) typo The second sentence in the first paragraph of Section 7.9, on page 12, v [...]. If the PE detects a service-affecting condition for a | particular DLCI, as defined in [Q933] Q.933, Annex A.5, sited in IA FRF1.1, the PE MUST communicate to the remote PE the status of the PW that corresponds to the frame relay DLCI status. [...] should say: v [...]. If the PE detects a service-affecting condition for a | particular DLCI, as defined in [Q933] Q.933, Annex A.5, cited in IA FRF1.1, the PE MUST communicate to the remote PE the status of the PW that corresponds to the frame relay DLCI status. [...] (7) typo/grammar The last sentence in the second paragraph of Section 7.9, on page 12, [...]. The IANA allocation registry of "Pseudowire Type" is defined in [RFC4446] along with initial allocated values. should say: | [...]. The IANA allocation registry of "Pseudowire Types" is defined | in [RFC4446] along with initially allocated values.
Notes:
from pending