RFC Errata
Found 4 records.
Status: Verified (2)
RFC 3987, "Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs)", January 2005
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: app
Errata ID: 631
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Martin Duerst
Date Reported: 2007-06-26
Throughout the document, when it says:
[semicolon outside] "http://example.org/rosé";
It should say:
[semicolon inside] "http://example.org/rosé"
Notes:
In ALL cases, the final semicolon has to be inside the double quotes, not outside. See the example above.
from pending
Errata ID: 629
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Martin Duerst
Date Reported: 2007-06-26
Section 3.1 says:
Syntaxical.
It should say:
Syntactical.
Notes:
from pending
Status: Held for Document Update (2)
RFC 3987, "Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs)", January 2005
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: app
Errata ID: 3163
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Martin Duerst
Date Reported: 2012-03-23
Held for Document Update by: Pete Resnick
Section 1.4. says:
For example, я stands for CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER YA.
It should say:
For example, Я stands for CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER YA.
Notes:
The correct code point for CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER YA is U+042F. U+044F would be CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YA. See http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0400.pdf.
Errata ID: 3297
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Martin Dürst
Date Reported: 2012-07-26
Held for Document Update by: Barry Leiba
Date Held: 2012-07-30
Section 10.2 says:
[Duerst97] Duerst, M., "The Properties and Promises of UTF-8", Proc. 11th International Unicode Conference, San Jose , September 1997, <http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/mml/mduerst/papers/ PDF/IUC11-UTF-8.pdf>.
It should say:
[Duerst97] Duerst, M., "The Properties and Promises of UTF-8", Proc. 11th International Unicode Conference, San Jose , September 1997, <http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp/2012/pub/ IUC11-UTF-8.pdf>.
Notes:
The Web site of the University of Zurich (my employer at the time of writing this paper) has been reorganized last year. I finally managed to retreive a copy of the paper and make it available again, at http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp/2012/pub/IUC11-UTF-8.pdf. It should be available there for the next 15-20 years. (I have already updated this in my internal copy of RFC3987bis.)
---
Reviewer's comments:
This change is absolutely needed, but it is not within the purview of the errata system. A valid erratum is something that would have been considered an error in the original document, had it been noticed at the time. This clearly does not qualify.
It really should be "rejected", but I'm going to mark it "held for document update", hoping that it's more likely to be noticed that way.