Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 2680, "A One-way Packet Loss Metric for IPPM", September 1999

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 7680

Errata ID: 1528
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Wenxia Dong
Date Reported: 2008-09-24
Verifier Name: Lars Eggert
Date Verified: 2009-05-14

Section 2.7 says:

The first two sources are interrelated and could result in a test
packet with finite delay being reported as lost.  Type-P-One-way-
Packet-Loss is 0 if the test packet does not arrive, or if it does
arrive and the difference between Src timestamp and Dst timestamp is
greater than the "reasonable period of time", or loss threshold.  

It should say:

The first two sources are interrelated and could result in a test
packet with finite delay being reported as lost.  Type-P-One-way-
Packet-Loss is 1 if the test packet does not arrive, or if it does
arrive and the difference between Src timestamp and Dst timestamp is
greater than the "reasonable period of time", or loss threshold.

Notes:

Type-P-One-way-Packet-Loss is 1 if the test packet does not arrive, according to section 2.4 Definition in RFC2680.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 2680, "A One-way Packet Loss Metric for IPPM", September 1999

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 7680

Errata ID: 3186
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Benoit Claise
Date Reported: 2012-04-11
Held for Document Update by: Wes Eddy

Section 1 says:

The structure of the memo is as follows:

   +  A 'singleton' analytic metric, called Type-P-One-way-Loss, is
      introduced to measure a single observation of packet transmission
      or loss.

It should say:

The structure of the memo is as follows:

   +  A 'singleton' analytic metric, called Type-P-One-way-Packet-Loss, is
      introduced to measure a single observation of packet transmission
      or loss.

Report New Errata