RFC Errata


Errata Search
 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 5 records.

Status: Verified (5)

RFC 2544, "Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices", March 1999

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 6201, RFC 6815, RFC 9004

Source of RFC: Legacy
Area Assignment: ops

Errata ID: 421
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Lu Jian Xiong
Date Reported: 2002-08-07

Section 6 says: 

   Since the tester both sends the test traffic and receives
   it back, after the traffic has been forwarded but the DUT, the tester
   can easily determine if all of the transmitted packets were received
   and verify that the correct packets were received.

It should say:

   Since the tester both sends the test traffic and receives
   it back, after the traffic has been forwarded by the DUT, the tester
   can easily determine if all of the transmitted packets were received
   and verify that the correct packets were received.

Errata ID: 423
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Scott Campbell
Date Reported: 2001-09-20

In Section C.2.2: 

   The network addresses 192.18.0.0 through 198.19.255.255 are have been
   assigned to the BMWG by the IANA for this purpose.

It should say:

   The network addresses 198.18.0.0 through 198.19.255.255 have been
   assigned to the BMWG by the IANA for this purpose.

Errata ID: 424
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Shiang-Ming Huang
Date Reported: 2004-09-08

Section 3 says: 

The authors understand that it will take a considerable period of time 
to perform all of the recommended tests nder  all of the recommended 
conditions. We believe that the results are worth the effort.  Appendix 
A lists some of the tests and conditions that we believe should be 
included for specific cases.

It should say:

The authors understand that it will take a considerable period of time 
to perform all of the recommended tests under all of the recommended 
conditions.  We believe that the results are worth the effort.  Appendix 
A lists some of the tests and conditions that we believe should be 
included for specific cases.

Notes:


Errata ID: 422
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Al Morton
Date Reported: 2006-11-05
Verifier Name: ron bonica
Date Verified: 2010-11-01

Section 26.1 says:

    Procedure:  Send a specific number of frames at a specific rate
    through the DUT and then count the frames that are transmitted by the
    DUT. If the count of offered frames is equal to the count of received
    frames, the fewer frames are received than were transmitted, the rate
    of the offered stream is reduced and the test is rerun.

It should say:

       Procedure:
       Send a specific number of frames at a specific rate through the
       DUT and then count the frames that are transmitted by the DUT. If
       the count of offered frames is equal to the count of received
       frames, the rate of the offered stream is raised and the test
       rerun.  If fewer frames are received than were transmitted, the
       rate of the offered stream is reduced and the test is rerun.

Errata ID: 4998
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Daniel Andrei Minca
Date Reported: 2017-04-18
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2017-04-18

Section 2 says: 

The authors understand that it will take a
   considerable period of time to perform all of the recommended tests
   nder  all of the recommended conditions.

It should say:

The authors understand that it will take a
   considerable period of time to perform all of the recommended tests
   under  all of the recommended conditions.

Notes:

It's missing the letter 'u'

Report New Errata



Advanced Search