Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (3)

RFC 20, "ASCII format for network interchange", October 1969

Errata ID: 4217
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: John Levine
Date Reported: 2015-01-03
Verifier Name: Barry Leiba
Date Verified: 2015-01-05

Section 4.2 says:

      2 The use of the symbols in 2/2, 2/7, 2/12, 5/14, /6/0, and 7/14
   as diacritical marks is described in Appendix A, A5.2
      3 These characters should not be used in international interchange
   without determining that there is agreement between sender and
   recipient.  (See Appendix B4.)

It should say:

     2 The use of the symbols in 2/2, 2/7, 2/12, 5/14, /6/0, and 7/14
   as diacritical marks is described in Appendix A, A5.2, of X3.4-1968.
      3 These characters should not be used in international interchange
   without determining that there is agreement between sender and
   recipient.  (See Appendix B4 of X3.4-1968.)

Notes:

The appendixes are in the original standard, not the RFC.

In the abstract, it says "X3, 4-" rather than "X3.4-" which is surely an OCR or transcription error.

Errata ID: 6652
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Ivan Panchenko
Date Reported: 2021-07-31
Verifier Name: RFC Editor

Section 4.2 says:

      2 The use of the symbols in 2/2, 2/7, 2/12, 5/14, /6/0, and 7/14

It should say:

      2 The use of the symbols in 2/2, 2/7, 2/12, 5/14, 6/0, and 7/14

Notes:

Unnecessary slash.

Errata ID: 6879
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: studentmain
Date Reported: 2022-03-12
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2022-03-14

Throughout the document, when it says:

where as UCLA uses X'OD' or 0/13 (carriage return).

It should say:

where as UCLA uses X'0D' or 0/13 (carriage return).

Notes:

x'0d', not x'od'

Report New Errata