RFC Errata
Found 1 record.
Status: Rejected (1)
RFC 9499, "DNS Terminology", March 2024
Source of RFC: dnsop (ops)
Errata ID: 8189
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Tony Lawrence
Date Reported: 2024-11-26
Rejected by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD)
Date Rejected: 2024-11-27
Section 2-11 says:
See notes
It should say:
See notes
Notes:
Definitions must be alphabetized in all sections in order to facilitate their lookup by the reader. It's "impossible" to infer if a term was actually "defined" when its location is random among other terms.
[WK: In general having definitions alphabetized makes sense, but in this particular case the WG decided to keep the current design ("This document contains a collection of a wide variety of DNS-related terms, organized loosely by topic." ]
--VERIFIER NOTES--
[WK: In general having definitions alphabetized makes sense, but in this particular case the WG decided to keep the current design ("This document contains a collection of a wide variety of DNS-related terms, organized loosely by topic." ]