RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 9312, "Manageability of the QUIC Transport Protocol", September 2022
Source of RFC: quic (wit)
Errata ID: 7996
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: No No
Date Reported: 2024-06-20
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2024-06-21
Section 2.1 and 8 says:
Operators should expect to observe packets with other version numbers as a result of various Internet experiments, future standards, and greasing [RFC7801]. ... [RFC7801] Dolmatov, V., Ed., "GOST R 34.12-2015: Block Cipher "Kuznyechik"", RFC 7801, DOI 10.17487/RFC7801, March 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7801>
It should say:
Operators should expect to observe packets with other version numbers as a result of various Internet experiments, future standards, and greasing [RFC8701]. ... [RFC 8701] Benjamin, D.,"Applying Generate Random Extensions And Sustain Extensibility (GREASE) to TLS Extensibility", RFC 8701, DOI 10.17487/RFC8701, January 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8701>.
Notes:
Typo, should be RFC8701 instead of RFC7801
Status: Held for Document Update (1)
RFC 9312, "Manageability of the QUIC Transport Protocol", September 2022
Source of RFC: quic (wit)
Errata ID: 8870
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Ike Kunze
Date Reported: 2026-04-07
Held for Document Update by: G Fairhurst
Date Held: 2026-04-09
Section 3.8 says:
The round-trip time (RTT) of QUIC flows can be inferred by observation once per flow during the handshake in passive TCP measurement;
It should say:
The round-trip time (RTT) of QUIC flows can be inferred by observation once per flow during the handshake, as in passive TCP measurement;
Notes:
The "as" got dropped from -18 to RFC9312.
The earlier wording is clearer because it refers to passive TCP measurement only as an analogy, avoiding the incorrect implication that QUIC RTT inference involves TCP.
