RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 1 record.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 8932, "Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators", October 2020

Source of RFC: dprive (int)

Errata ID: 6629
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML

Reported By: Joeri de Ruiter
Date Reported: 2021-07-05
Held for Document Update by: Eric Vyncke
Date Held: 2021-07-05

Section B.1. says:

One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port
numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the
original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (>1024).

It should say:

One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port
numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the
original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (<1024).

Notes:

Nonephemeral port numbers are <1024

--- Verifier note ---
The errata is indeed a real typo. As it is in appendix, "held for document update" was selected.

Report New Errata