RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 1 record.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 8610, "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures", June 2019

Source of RFC: cbor (art)

Errata ID: 6278
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Eric Seppanen
Date Reported: 2020-09-04
Held for Document Update by: Barry Leiba
Date Held: 2020-09-04

Section Appendix B says:

BCHAR = %x20-26 / %x28-5B / %x5D-10FFFD / SESC / CRLF

It should say:

BCHAR = %x20-26 / %x28-5B / %x5D-7E / %x80-10FFFD / SESC / CRLF

Notes:

Between draft 6 and 7 of the RFC, the ASCII DELETE character 0x7F was excluded from the character set allowed in text literals. I believe it should also be excluded from the character set of bytestring literals.

A 0x7F byte could not be decoded if included in a hex or base64 bytestring, leaving only UTF-8 bytestrings. Since there is no discussion in the text of any reason to allow this character in a UTF-8 bytestring when it was not allowed in a UTF-8 text string, I suspect this was an oversight.

===== Verifier notes =====
It was, indeed, an oversight, but discussion on the CBOR working group list shows that the proper fix is not straightforward, and that it should be handled in the next version of the spec.

Report New Errata