Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 8505, "Registration Extensions for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Neighbor Discovery", November 2018

Errata ID: 5574
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Pascal Thubert
Date Reported: 2018-12-11
Verifier Name: Erik Kline
Date Verified: 2021-04-29

Section 9.1. says:

ARO Status

It should say:

Bit

Notes:

Title of the first column in table 2 should be ‘Bit’ as opposed to ‘ARO Status’.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 8505, "Registration Extensions for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Neighbor Discovery", November 2018

Errata ID: 5557
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Devin Edmison
Date Reported: 2018-11-20
Held for Document Update by: Erik Kline
Date Held: 2021-04-29

Section Abstract says:

This specification updates RFC 6775 -- the Low-Power Wireless
   Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Neighbor Discovery specification --
   to clarify the role of the protocol as a registration technique and
   simplify the registration operation in 6LoWPAN routers, as well as to
   provide enhancements to the registration capabilities and mobility
   detection for different network topologies, including the Routing
   Registrars performing routing for host routes and/or proxy Neighbor
   Discovery in a low-power network.

It should say:

This specification updates RFC 6775 -- the Low-Power Wireless
   Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Neighbor Discovery specification --
   to clarify the role of the protocol as a registration technique,
   to simplify the registration operation in 6LoWPAN routers, and to
   provide enhancements to the registration capabilities and mobility
   detection for different network topologies, including the Routing
   Registrars performing routing for host routes and/or proxy Neighbor
   Discovery in a low-power network.

Notes:

Change wording to flow in a smooth way.

-----

From https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-rfc-errata/

"Changes which are simply stylistic issues or simply make things read better should be Hold for Document Update. "

Report New Errata