RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Held for Document Update (2)
RFC 8164, "Opportunistic Security for HTTP/2", May 2017
Source of RFC: httpbis (wit)
Errata ID: 5023
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Xiaoyin Liu
Date Reported: 2017-05-19
Held for Document Update by: Alexey Melnikov
Date Held: 2017-10-18
Section Abstract says:
This mechanism not a replacement for "https" URIs; it is vulnerable to active attacks.
It should say:
This mechanism is not a replacement for "https" URIs; it is vulnerable to active attacks.
Notes:
This sentence is in the Abstract. It misses the verb "is".
Alexey: This is correct, but it is unlikely to confuse readers.
Errata ID: 5490
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Steven Meixner
Date Reported: 2018-09-04
Held for Document Update by: Francesca Palombini
Date Held: 2022-11-09
Section 2 says:
in order minimize the delays that might be incurred.
It should say:
in order to minimize the delays that might be incurred.
Notes:
Grammar only.