RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Reported (1)

RFC 8164, "Opportunistic Security for HTTP/2", May 2017

Source of RFC: httpbis (art)

Errata ID: 5490
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Steven Meixner
Date Reported: 2018-09-04

Section 2 says:

in order minimize the delays that might be incurred.

It should say:

in order to minimize the delays that might be incurred.

Notes:

Grammar only.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 8164, "Opportunistic Security for HTTP/2", May 2017

Source of RFC: httpbis (art)

Errata ID: 5023
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Xiaoyin Liu
Date Reported: 2017-05-19
Held for Document Update by: Alexey Melnikov
Date Held: 2017-10-18

Section Abstract says:

This mechanism not a replacement for "https"
URIs; it is vulnerable to active attacks.

It should say:

This mechanism is not a replacement for "https"
URIs; it is vulnerable to active attacks.

Notes:

This sentence is in the Abstract. It misses the verb "is".

Alexey: This is correct, but it is unlikely to confuse readers.

Report New Errata