RFC Errata
Found 1 record.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 7684, "OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement", November 2015
Source of RFC: ospf (rtg)
Errata ID: 8104
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Kris Michielsen
Date Reported: 2024-09-16
Verifier Name: Gunter Van de Velde
Date Verified: 2024-09-16
Section 2.1 says:
Route Type The type of the OSPFv2 route. If the route type is 0 (Unspecified), the information inside the OSPFv2 External Prefix TLV applies to the prefix regardless of prefix's route type. This is useful when prefix-specific attributes are advertised by an external entity that is not aware of the route type associated with the prefix. Supported types are:
It should say:
Route Type The type of the OSPFv2 route. If the route type is 0 (Unspecified), the information inside the OSPFv2 Extended Prefix TLV applies to the prefix regardless of prefix's route type. This is useful when prefix-specific attributes are advertised by an external entity that is not aware of the route type associated with the prefix. Supported types are:
Notes:
s/External Prefix/Extended Prefix/