RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 6107, "Procedures for Dynamically Signaled Hierarchical Label Switched Paths", February 2011
Source of RFC: ccamp (rtg)
Errata ID: 3018
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alan Davey
Date Reported: 2011-11-10
Verifier Name: Adrian Farrel
Date Verified: 2011-11-12
Section 3.2 says:
If the P-flag in the Actions field in the LSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE_ID object in a Resv message is set (i.e., one) indicating that the LSP is not to be advertised as a link, this TLV SHOULD NOT be present and MUST be ignored if encountered.
It should say:
If the P-flag in the Actions field in the LSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE_ID object in a Path message is set (i.e., one) indicating that the LSP is not to be advertised as a link, this TLV SHOULD NOT be present and MUST be ignored if encountered.
Notes:
The change is s/Resv/Path/
Status: Held for Document Update (1)
RFC 6107, "Procedures for Dynamically Signaled Hierarchical Label Switched Paths", February 2011
Source of RFC: ccamp (rtg)
Errata ID: 3412
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Kris Michielsen
Date Reported: 2012-11-16
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel
Section 3.1.2 says:
Type (16 bits) The identifier of the TLV. Two type values are defined in this document: 1 IGP Instance Identifier TLV 2 Unnumbered Component Link Identifier TLV 3 IPv4 Numbered Component Link Identifier TLV 4 IPv6 Numbered Component Link Identifier TLV
It should say:
Type (16 bits) The identifier of the TLV. Four type values are defined in this document: 1 IGP Instance Identifier TLV 2 Unnumbered Component Link Identifier TLV 3 IPv4 Numbered Component Link Identifier TLV 4 IPv6 Numbered Component Link Identifier TLV
Notes:
s/Two/Four/