Found 2 records.

Status: Held for Document Update (2)

RFC 5506, "Support for Reduced-Size Real-Time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP): Opportunities and Consequences", April 2009

Errata ID: 2118
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-04-05
Held for Document Update by: Robert Sparks

Section Abstract says:

   This memo discusses benefits and issues that arise when allowing
|  Real-time Transport Protocol (RTCP) packets to be transmitted with
   reduced size.  [...]

It should say:

   This memo discusses benefits and issues that arise when allowing
|  Real-time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP) packets to be transmitted
   with reduced size.  [...]

Notes:

Rationale: Consistency with document title (and RFC 3550).

Errata ID: 2119
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-04-05
Held for Document Update by: Robert Sparks

Section 3.4.5 says:

|  o  Compression of RTCP: No IETF-defined header compression method
      compress RTCP; however, if such methods are developed in the
|     future, these methods must take Reduced-Size RTCP in account.

It should say:

|  o  Compression of RTCP: No IETF-defined header compression methods
      compress RTCP; however, if such methods are developed in the
|     future, these methods must take Reduced-Size RTCP into account.

Notes:

Rationale: singular/plural mismatch; language improvement.

Report New Errata