RFC Errata
Found 7 records.
Status: Verified (4)
RFC 5092, "IMAP URL Scheme", November 2007
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 5593
Source of RFC: lemonade (app)
Errata ID: 1802
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Tony Hansen
Date Reported: 2009-07-06
Verifier Name: Alexey Melnikov
Date Verified: 2009-07-06
Section 9 says:
If the following relative URL is located in that body part:
<;section=1.4>
this could result in the following client commands:
C: A004 UID FETCH 20 (BODY.PEEK[1.2.MIME]
^
BODY.PEEK[1.MIME]
BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (Content-Location)])
It should say:
If the following relative URL is located in that body part:
<;section=1.4>
this could result in the following client commands:
C: A004 UID FETCH 20 (BODY.PEEK[1.4.MIME]
^
BODY.PEEK[1.MIME]
BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (Content-Location)])
Notes:
1.2.MIME should read 1.4.MIME
Errata ID: 1091
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alexey Melnikov
Date Reported: 2007-12-10
Verifier Name: Alexey Melnikov
Date Verified: 2009-06-19
Section 7 says:
[URI-GEN] defines four forms of relative URLs: <inetwork-path>, <iabsolute-path>, <irelative-path>, and <ipath-empty>. Their syntax is defined in Section 11.
It should say:
[URI-GEN] defines four forms of relative URLs: <network-path>, <absolute-path>, <relative-path>, and <path-empty>. This document introduces more restricted, IMAP-specific syntax corresponding to these non-terminals, <inetwork-path>, <iabsolute-path>, <irelative-path>, and <ipath-empty>. Their syntax is defined in Section 11.
Notes:
[URI-GEN] doesn't define <inetwork-path>, <iabsolute-path>, <irelative-path>, and <ipath-empty>, they are defined in the RFC 5092.
The issue was identified by Alfred Hœnes <ah@tr-sys.de>, he also suggested the new text.
Errata ID: 1092
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alexey Melnikov
Date Reported: 2007-12-10
Verifier Name: Alexey Melnikov
Date Verified: 2009-06-19
In Appendix A, it says:
/* Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007). This version of sample C code is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices. Regarding this sample C code (or any portion of it), the authors make no guarantees and are not responsible for any damage resulting from its use. The authors grant irrevocable permission to anyone to use, modify, and distribute it in any way that does not diminish the rights of anyone else to use, modify, and distribute it, provided that redistributed derivative works do not contain misleading author or version information. Derivative works need not be licensed under similar terms. */
It should say:
/* Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007). This version of sample C code is part of RFC 5092; see the RFC itself for full legal notices. Regarding this sample C code (or any portion of it), the authors make no guarantees and are not responsible for any damage resulting from its use. The authors grant irrevocable permission to anyone to use, modify, and distribute it in any way that does not diminish the rights of anyone else to use, modify, and distribute it, provided that redistributed derivative works do not contain misleading author or version information. Derivative works need not be licensed under similar terms. */
Notes:
Changed RFC XXXX to RFC 5092.
The issue was reported by Alfred Hœnes <ah@tr-sys.de>.
Errata ID: 6598
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: queila
Date Reported: 2021-06-05
Verifier Name: Orie Steele
Date Verified: 2024-04-01
Section 7 says:
[URI-GEN] defines four forms of relative URLs: <inetwork-path>, <iabsolute-path>, <irelative-path>, and <ipath-empty>. Their syntax is defined in Section 11.
It should say:
[URI-GEN] defines four forms of relative URLs: <network-path>, <absolute-path>, <relative-path>, and <path-empty>. This document introduces more restricted, IMAP-specific syntax corresponding to these non-terminals, <inetwork-path>, <iabsolute-path>, <irelative-path>, and <ipath-empty>. Their syntax is defined in Section 11.
Notes:
[URI-GEN] doesn't define <inetwork-path>, <iabsolute-path>, <irelative-path>, and <ipath-empty>, they are defined in the RFC 5092.
The issue was identified by Alfred Hœnes <ah@tr-sys.de>, he also suggested the new text.
Status: Held for Document Update (3)
RFC 5092, "IMAP URL Scheme", November 2007
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 5593
Source of RFC: lemonade (app)
Errata ID: 2699
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Date Reported: 2011-02-01
Held for Document Update by: Alexey Melnikov
Section 13.2 says:
[URI-REG] Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and
Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP 115,
RFC 4395, February 2006.
It should say:
[URI-REG] Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and
Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP 35,
RFC 4395, February 2006.
Notes:
RFC 4395 is not BCP 115, but BCP 35.
Errata ID: 2802
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Date Reported: 2011-05-08
Held for Document Update by: Pete Resnick
Throughout the document, when it says:
imap: URI scheme
It should say:
'imap' URI Scheme
Notes:
The ":" (colon) character is not a part of URI scheme name. RFC 3986 says:
URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]
scheme = ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." )
i. e. ":" is a delimiter between scheme name and the remainder of URI.
Errata ID: 2846
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Date Reported: 2011-06-28
Held for Document Update by: Peter Saint-Andre
Section 11 says:
ipath-empty = 0<pchar>
; Zero characters.
; The same-document reference.
It should say:
ipath-empty = ""
; Zero characters.
; The same-document reference.
Notes:
Copying Erratum report #2033 for RFC 3986 by Tanaka Akira. "0<foo>" assumes "foo" is <pros-val> of RFC 5234, which it isn't. Given this should identify null string, "" is appropriate, in my opinion.