RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 4906, "Transport of Layer 2 Frames Over MPLS", June 2007
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: rtg
Errata ID: 1034
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-08-17
Verifier Name: Stewart Bryant
Date Verified: 2011-01-17
Section 6 says:
0x8008 CEM [CEM]
It should say:
0x0008 CEM [CEM]
Notes:
This is a typo in the VC Type assignment list in this document.
The correct value (0x0008) is in the IANA MPLS Pseudowire Types Registry
and in the CEM specification (RFC5143)
Status: Held for Document Update (1)
RFC 4906, "Transport of Layer 2 Frames Over MPLS", June 2007
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: rtg
Errata ID: 1035
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-08-17
Held for Document Update by: Stewart Bryant
(1) Abstract -- another erroneous acronym expansion
In the Abstract of RFC 4906,
"Synchronized Optical Network (SONET)"
^^^^
should say:
"Synchronous Optical Network (SONET)"
^^^
(2) Section 5.2.1 -- missing punctuation
Section 5.2.1 (on page 6 of RFC 4906) says:
ATM AAL5 Common Part Convergence Sublayer - Service Data Units
| (CPCS-SDUs) are encapsulated according to [RFC4905] ATM AAL5 CPCS-SDU
mode. [...]
^
It should say:
ATM AAL5 Common Part Convergence Sublayer - Service Data Units
| (CPCS-SDUs) are encapsulated according to [RFC4905], ATM AAL5 CPCS-
SDU mode. [...]
^^
(3) [[posted separately.]]
(4) Section 6.1 -- missing punctuation
On mid-page 11, the explanation for 'Payload Bytes' says:
A 2-octet value indicating the number of TDM payload octets
| contained in all packets on the CEM stream from 48 to 1,023
octets. [...]
^
It should says:
A 2-octet value indicating the number of TDM payload octets
| contained in all packets on the CEM stream, from 48 to 1,023
octets. [...]
^^
(5) Section 9 -- punctuation
On page 18, the [ANSI.T1.105] entry of Section 9 does not use the
'rational quotation' style requested for RFCs in all related
documents (RFC Author guides).
The RFC says:
[ANSI.T1.105] American National Standards Institute, "Synchronous
| Optical Network Formats," ANSI T1.105-1995.
^^
It should say:
[ANSI.T1.105] American National Standards Institute, "Synchronous
| Optical Network Formats", ANSI T1.105-1995.
^^
