RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 4906, "Transport of Layer 2 Frames Over MPLS", June 2007
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: rtg
Errata ID: 1034
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-08-17
Verifier Name: Stewart Bryant
Date Verified: 2011-01-17
Section 6 says:
0x8008 CEM [CEM]
It should say:
0x0008 CEM [CEM]
Notes:
This is a typo in the VC Type assignment list in this document.
The correct value (0x0008) is in the IANA MPLS Pseudowire Types Registry
and in the CEM specification (RFC5143)
Status: Held for Document Update (1)
RFC 4906, "Transport of Layer 2 Frames Over MPLS", June 2007
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: rtg
Errata ID: 1035
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-08-17
Held for Document Update by: Stewart Bryant
(1) Abstract -- another erroneous acronym expansion In the Abstract of RFC 4906, "Synchronized Optical Network (SONET)" ^^^^ should say: "Synchronous Optical Network (SONET)" ^^^ (2) Section 5.2.1 -- missing punctuation Section 5.2.1 (on page 6 of RFC 4906) says: ATM AAL5 Common Part Convergence Sublayer - Service Data Units | (CPCS-SDUs) are encapsulated according to [RFC4905] ATM AAL5 CPCS-SDU mode. [...] ^ It should say: ATM AAL5 Common Part Convergence Sublayer - Service Data Units | (CPCS-SDUs) are encapsulated according to [RFC4905], ATM AAL5 CPCS- SDU mode. [...] ^^ (3) [[posted separately.]] (4) Section 6.1 -- missing punctuation On mid-page 11, the explanation for 'Payload Bytes' says: A 2-octet value indicating the number of TDM payload octets | contained in all packets on the CEM stream from 48 to 1,023 octets. [...] ^ It should says: A 2-octet value indicating the number of TDM payload octets | contained in all packets on the CEM stream, from 48 to 1,023 octets. [...] ^^ (5) Section 9 -- punctuation On page 18, the [ANSI.T1.105] entry of Section 9 does not use the 'rational quotation' style requested for RFCs in all related documents (RFC Author guides). The RFC says: [ANSI.T1.105] American National Standards Institute, "Synchronous | Optical Network Formats," ANSI T1.105-1995. ^^ It should say: [ANSI.T1.105] American National Standards Institute, "Synchronous | Optical Network Formats", ANSI T1.105-1995. ^^