Found 2 records.

Status: Held for Document Update (2)

RFC 4586, "Extended RTP Profile for Real-time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP)-Based Feedback: Results of the Timing Rule Simulations", July 2006

Errata ID: 50
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-08-17
Held for Document Update by: Robert Sparks

Section 4.1 says:

   We can see that in configurations where both agents use the new
   timing rules each of them uses, at most, about 2.5% of the session
   bandwidth for RTP, which sums up to 5% of the session bandwidth for
   both.

It should say:

   We can see that in configurations where both agents use the new
   timing rules each of them uses, at most, about 2.5% of the session
   bandwidth for RTCP, which sums up to 5% of the session bandwidth for
   both.  

Notes:

RTP -> RTCP

from pending

Errata ID: 766
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-08-17
Held for Document Update by: Cullen Jennings

Section 7.3 says:

|  We have shown that the limitations of RTP AVPF profile do not
   generate such high delay in the feedback messages that the
   performance of NEWPRED is degraded for sessions from 32 kbps to 2
   Mbps.

It should say:

|  We have shown that the limitations of the RTP AVPF profile do not
   generate such high delay in the feedback messages that the
   performance of NEWPRED is degraded for sessions from 32 kbps to 2
   Mbps.  

Notes:

missing article

from pending

Report New Errata