RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 3036, "LDP Specification", January 2001

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 5036

Source of RFC: mpls (rtg)

Errata ID: 346

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Elena Taguer
Date Reported: 2001-02-01

Section 3.5.1.2.2 says:

   If the TLV type is >= 0x8000 (high order bit 1) the TLV is
   silently dropped.  Section "Unknown TLV in Known Message Type"
   elaborates on this behavior.

Notes:

There is no section with this title. The sentence in question should
have been deleted. It refers to a section that was deleted in a
version of the I-D that led to the RFC.

Status: Rejected (2)

RFC 3036, "LDP Specification", January 2001

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 5036

Source of RFC: mpls (rtg)

Errata ID: 345

Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Barbara Denny
Date Reported: 2006-04-13
Rejected by: Adrian Farrel
Date Rejected: 2009-08-24
Report Text:


A reference for [Dobb] is missing.

Rationale:
In section 2.9.1, there is a mention of a problem
with MD5. The text refers to [Dobb] but the
reference section contains no citation.

 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
RFC3036 has been obsoleted by RFC5036.
The text that gives rise to this issue is a direct quote from RFC 2385. That reference should be explored to determine the full implications of the text.

Errata ID: 1837

Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Barbara Denny
Date Reported: 2006-04-13
Rejected by: Adrian Farrel
Date Rejected: 2009-08-24
Report Text:


A reference for [Dobb] is missing.

Rationale:
In section 2.9.1, there is a mention of a problem
with MD5. The text refers to [Dobb] but the
reference section contains no citation.

 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
RFC 3036 has been obsoleted by RFC 5036.

The text at issue is a quote from another RFC. That RFC can be inspected to find the full context.

Report New Errata