RFC Errata


Errata Search
 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 4 records.

Status: Verified (2)

RFC 2392, "Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource Locators", August 1998

Source of RFC: mhtml (app)

Errata ID: 454
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Bruce Lilly
Date Reported: 2002-03-07

Section 2 says: 

   example, "cid:foo4%25foo1@bar.net" corresponds to

     Content-ID: <foo4%25foo1@bar.net>

It should say:

   example, "cid:foo4%25foo1@bar.net" corresponds to

     Content-ID: <foo4%foo1@bar.net>

Errata ID: 6176
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Michael Witten (mfwitten)
Date Reported: 2020-05-16
Verifier Name: Barry Leiba
Date Verified: 2020-05-16

Section 2 says: 

--boundary-example-1

Content-ID: <foo4*foo1@bar.net>
Content-Type: IMAGE/GIF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64

It should say:

--boundary-example-1
Content-ID: <foo4*foo1@bar.net>
Content-Type: IMAGE/GIF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64

Notes:

There should not be a blank line between "--boundary-example-1"
and "Content-ID: <foo4*foo1@bar.net>". See the syntax provided
by the BNF term "multipart-body" in RFC 2046.

Status: Held for Document Update (2)

RFC 2392, "Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource Locators", August 1998

Source of RFC: mhtml (app)

Errata ID: 3382
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Thomas Lane
Date Reported: 2012-10-17
Held for Document Update by: Barry Leiba

Section 2 says: 

Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="boundary-example-1";
                   type=Text/HTML

--boundary-example 1
     Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset=US-ASCII

It should say:

Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="boundary-example-1";
                   type=Text/HTML

--boundary-example-1
     Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset=US-ASCII

Notes:

Missing dash in first boundary string. I omitted the page break that was between the Content-Type header and the boundary.

Errata ID: 6175
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Michael Witten (mfwitten)
Date Reported: 2020-05-16
Held for Document Update by: Barry Leiba
Date Held: 2020-05-16

Section 2 says: 

However, in many systems that store messages,
body parts are not indexed independently
their context (message).

It should say:

However, in many systems that store messages,
body parts are not indexed independently of
their context (message).

Notes:

The word "of" is missing after "independently" in "independently their context".

Report New Errata



Advanced Search