RFC Errata
Found 1 record.
Status: Reported (1)
RFC 524, "Proposed Mail Protocol", June 1973
Source of RFC: Legacy
Errata ID: 7170
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: bossbitxh52
Date Reported: 2022-10-17
Section 2.1 says:
Section 2.1 says: Some RFCs standardize the results of community deliberations about statements of principle or conclusions about what is the best way to perform some operations or IETF process function. These RFCs form the specification has been adopted as a BCP, it is given the additional label "BCPxxx", but it keeps its RFC number and its place in the RFC series. (see section 5)
It should say:
It should say: Some RFCs standardize the results of community deliberations about statements of principle or conclusions about what is the best way to perform some operations or IETF process function. These RFCs form the 'BCP' (Best Current Practice) subseries of the RFC series. When a specification has been adopted as a BCP, it is given the additional label "BCPxxx", but it keeps its RFC number and its place in the RFC series. (see section 5)
Notes:
Notes:
The reference to BCP-11 should be to BCP-9 (RFC 2026 itself).