RFC Errata
RFC 4872, "RSVP-TE Extensions in Support of End-to-End Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Recovery", May 2007
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 4873, RFC 6780, RFC 9270
Source of RFC: ccamp (rtg)See Also: RFC 4872 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 929
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-07
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2007-11-02
Section 15.1 says:
The primary path route is specified via the PRIMARY_PATH_ROUTE object (PPRO). The Primary Path Route Class Number (Class-Num) of form 0bbbbbbb 38.
It should say:
The primary path route is specified via the PRIMARY_PATH_ROUTE object (PPRO). The Primary Path Route Class Number (Class-Num) of form 0bbbbbbb is 38. or even: The primary path route is specified via the PRIMARY_PATH_ROUTE object (PPRO). The Primary Path Route Class Number (Class-Num) of form 0bbbbbbb assigned by IANA is 38.
Notes:
Missing verb.
from pending