RFC Errata
RFC 4086, "Randomness Requirements for Security", June 2005
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: sec
See Also: RFC 4086 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 8625
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: mrrccc
Date Reported: 2025-11-02
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2025-11-05
Section 6.1.3. says:
Despite meeting all the tests suggested by Knuth, that sequence is unsuitable for cryptographic us, as adversaries must be assumed to have copies of all commonly published "random" sequences and to be able to spot the source and predict future values.
It should say:
Despite meeting all the tests suggested by Knuth, that sequence is unsuitable for cryptographic use, as adversaries must be assumed to have copies of all commonly published "random" sequences and to be able to spot the source and predict future values.
Notes:
Simple typo; missing "e" in the expression "for cryptographic us,".
