RFC 9832, "BGP Classful Transport Planes", September 2025

Errata ID: 8583
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Natrajan Venkataraman
Date Reported: 2025-09-25
Verifier Name: Ketan Talaulikar
Date Verified: 2025-09-30

Section 3 says:

Original Text 1:

   Figure 1 depicts the intra-AS and inter-AS application of these
   constructs.  Interactions between SN1 and PE11 describe the intra-AS
   usage.  Interactions between PE21 and PE11 describe the inter-AS
   usage.


Original Text 2:

   For the intra-AS case, SN1 maps this intra-AS route on RSVP-TE
   tunnels with TC ID 100 by using the Resolution Scheme for
   color:0:100.

Original Text 3:

   PE21 maps the inter-AS service routes received with color:0:100 from
   AS1 on BGP CT tunnel with TC ID 100 by using the Resolution Scheme
   for color:0:100.  Note that this procedure is same as that followed
   by SN1 in the intra-AS case.

It should say:

Corrected Text 1:

   Figure 1 depicts the intra-AS and inter-AS application of these
   constructs.  Interactions between SN11 and PE11 describe the intra-AS
   usage.  Interactions between PE21 and PE11 describe the inter-AS
   usage.


Corrected Text 2:

   For the intra-AS case, SN11 maps this intra-AS route on RSVP-TE
   tunnels with TC ID 100 by using the Resolution Scheme for
   color:0:100.

Corrected Text 3:

   PE21 maps the inter-AS service routes received with color:0:100 from
   AS1 on BGP CT tunnel with TC ID 100 by using the Resolution Scheme
   for color:0:100.  Note that this procedure is same as that followed
   by SN11 in the intra-AS case.

Notes:

In Section 3, Architecture Overview, the diagram shows "SN11" as a service node in AS1. In this section, there are 3 occurrences of "SN11" wrongly labeled as "SN1" in Section 3 text. I kindly request that this editorial misrepresentation be corrected. Original and Corrected text have been added for all the three occurrences.

Report New Errata