RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 8984, "JSCalendar: A JSON Representation of Calendar Data", July 2021

Source of RFC: calext (art)
See Also: RFC 8984 w/ inline errata

Errata ID: 6872
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML

Reported By: Robert Stepanek
Date Reported: 2022-03-07
Verifier Name: Francesca Palombini
Date Verified: 2022-03-20

Section 4.4.3. says:

   "private":  The details of the object are hidden; only the basic time
      and metadata are shared.  The following properties MAY be shared;
      any other properties MUST NOT be shared:

      *  @type

      *  created

      *  due

      *  duration

      *  estimatedDuration

      *  freeBusyStatus

      *  privacy

      *  recurrenceOverrides (Only patches that apply to another
         permissible property are allowed to be shared.)

      *  sequence

      *  showWithoutTime

      *  start

      *  timeZone

      *  timeZones

      *  uid

      *  updated

It should say:

   "private":  The details of the object are hidden; only the basic time
      and metadata are shared.  The following properties MAY be shared;
      any other properties MUST NOT be shared:
 
      *  @type
 
      *  created
 
      *  due
 
      *  duration
 
      *  estimatedDuration
 
      *  excluded
 
      *  excludedRecurrenceRules
 
      *  freeBusyStatus
 
      *  privacy
 
      *  recurrenceId
 
      *  recurrenceIdTimeZone
 
      *  recurrenceOverrides (Only patches that apply to another
         permissible property are allowed to be shared.)
 
      *  recurrenceRules
 
      *  sequence
 
      *  showWithoutTime
 
      *  start
 
      *  timeZone
 
      *  timeZones
 
      *  uid
 
      *  updated

Notes:

Adds the excluded, excludedRecurrenceRules, recurrenceId, recurrenceIdTimeZone and recurrenceRules properties to the list of shared properties of private events.

Only the combination of all recurrence properties allows to generate the full recurrence set for the event.

Omitting the properties was an oversight during the initial publication of this RFC.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search