RFC 9067, "A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy", October 2021

Errata ID: 6845
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Kris Lambrechts
Date Reported: 2022-02-10
Rejected by: Alvaro Retana
Date Rejected: 2022-02-11

Section 7.2. says:

               list prefix-list {
                 key "ip-prefix mask-length-lower mask-length-upper";
                 description
                   "List of prefixes in the prefix set.";
                 uses prefix;
               }

It should say:

               list prefix {
                 key "ip-prefix mask-length-lower mask-length-upper";
                 description
                   "List of prefixes in the prefix set.";
                 uses prefix;
               }

Notes:

The name of this list is not natural and makes instance data hard to read. This is very apparent in the example in Appendix B. Policy Examples
--VERIFIER NOTES--
From the WG discussion: "This is a rather subjective comment since at this YANG data node is, in fact, a list. Also, it is a moot point since changing this would be a non-backward compatible YANG change."

Report New Errata