RFC Errata
RFC 6125, "Representation and Verification of Domain-Based Application Service Identity within Internet Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX) Certificates in the Context of Transport Layer Security (TLS)", March 2011
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 9525
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: app
Errata ID: 5673
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Michael James
Date Reported: 2019-03-25
Throughout the document, when it says:
If the certificate will be used for only a single type of application service, then the service provider is encouraged to request a certificate that includes a DNS-ID and, if appropriate for the application service type, an SRV-ID or URI-ID that limits the deployment scope of the certificate to only the defined application service type.
It should say:
If the certificate will be used for only a single type of application service, the service provider is encouraged to request a certificate that includes a DNS-ID and, if appropriate for the application service type, an SRV-ID or URI-ID that limits the deployment scope of the certificate to only the defined application service type.
Notes:
All the sentences in the RFC (not just the one above) are written as pseudo code using IF...THEN. Normative English sentence structure the IF is a Conjunction for a Subordinating Clause. The THEN after the comma should be dropped to start the subject or main clause of the sentence.