RFC 7519, "JSON Web Token (JWT)", May 2015

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7797, RFC 8725

Errata ID: 5648
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Andy Delcambre
Date Reported: 2019-03-08
Rejected by: Roman Danyliw
Date Rejected: 2024-01-12

Section 1 says:

JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact claims representation format
   intended for space constrained environments such as HTTP
   Authorization headers and URI query parameters.  JWTs encode claims
   to be transmitted as a JSON [RFC7159] object that is used as the
   payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) [JWS] structure or as the
   plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) [JWE] structure, enabling
   the claims to be digitally signed or integrity protected with a
   Message Authentication Code (MAC) and/or encrypted.  JWTs are always
   represented using the JWS Compact Serialization or the JWE Compact
   Serialization.

   The suggested pronunciation of JWT is the same as the English word
   "jot".

It should say:

JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact claims representation format
   intended for space constrained environments such as HTTP
   Authorization headers and URI query parameters.  JWTs encode claims
   to be transmitted as a JSON [RFC7159] object that is used as the
   payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) [JWS] structure or as the
   plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) [JWE] structure, enabling
   the claims to be digitally signed or integrity protected with a
   Message Authentication Code (MAC) and/or encrypted.  JWTs are always
   represented using the JWS Compact Serialization or the JWE Compact
   Serialization.

Notes:

The suggested pronunciation is strange and confusing. It makes it hard to onboard new people verbally and always requires an explanation of the pronunciation. The standard already has a perfectly reasonable initialism of JWT that clearly refers to JSON Web Tokens. It is jarring to suggest a pronunciation that does not map to the letters of the spec, and in my experience often leads to confusion when used.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
This guidance was produced with the consensus of the WG. Per https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-errata-ietf-stream/, "Errata are items that were errors at the time the document was published"

Report New Errata