RFC Errata
RFC 8311, "Relaxing Restrictions on Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation", January 2018
Source of RFC: tsvwg (wit)See Also: RFC 8311 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 5399
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: David Black
Date Reported: 2018-06-19
Verifier Name: Spencer Dawkins
Date Verified: 2018-11-16
Section 7 says:
(n/a, this errata adds an additional IANA Consideration)
It should say:
To reflect the experimental use of ECT(1) envisioned by this memo, IANA has added the following footnote to the ECN Field registry <https://www.iana.org/assignments/dscp-registry/ dscp-registry.xhtml#ecn-field>: ECT(1) is for experimental use only [RFC8311, Section 4.2]
Notes:
The Corrected Text is written as if IANA has already added the footnote, which will be done upon approval of this errata, citing this approved errata as justification.
(From Spencer - this could have been Held for Document Update, but I think Verified is just about as correct)