RFC Errata
RFC 1894, "An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications", January 1996
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 3464
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 2852
Source of RFC: notary (app)See Also: RFC 1894 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 534
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Bruce Lilly
Date Reported: 2002-02-25
Section 9.4 says:
Received: from nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk id <g.12954-0@sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>; Sun, 10 Jul 1994 00:36:51 +0100 To: owner-info-mime@cs.utk.edu Date: Sun, 10 Jul 1994 00:36:51 +0100 Subject: WARNING: message delayed at "nsfnet-relay.ac.uk" content-type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=foobar
It should say:
Received: from nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk id <g.12954-0@sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>; Sun, 10 Jul 1994 00:36:51 +0100 To: owner-info-mime@cs.utk.edu Date: Sun, 10 Jul 1994 00:36:51 +0100 Subject: WARNING: message delayed at "nsfnet-relay.ac.uk" MIME-Version: 1.0 content-type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=foobar