RFC 8164, "Opportunistic Security for HTTP/2", May 2017Source of RFC: httpbis (art)
Errata ID: 5023
Status: Held for Document Update
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Xiaoyin Liu
Date Reported: 2017-05-19
Held for Document Update by: Alexey Melnikov
Date Held: 2017-10-18
Section Abstract says:
This mechanism not a replacement for "https" URIs; it is vulnerable to active attacks.
It should say:
This mechanism is not a replacement for "https" URIs; it is vulnerable to active attacks.
This sentence is in the Abstract. It misses the verb "is".
Alexey: This is correct, but it is unlikely to confuse readers.