RFC 2681, "A Round-trip Delay Metric for IPPM", September 1999Source of RFC: ippm (tsv)
Errata ID: 397
Status: Held for Document Update
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Andrew Main
Date Reported: 2002-11-18
Held for Document Update by: Lars Eggert
Date Held: 2009-05-14
Section 4.1 says:
Then the 50th percentile would be 110 msec, since 90 msec and 100 msec are smaller and 110 msec and 'undefined' are larger.
It should say:
Then the 50th percentile would be 110 msec, since 90 msec and 100 msec are smaller and 500 msec and 'undefined' are larger. See Section 11.3 of  for computing percentiles.
Corrected text suggested by Matt Zekauskas (email@example.com).