RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 4631, "Link Management Protocol (LMP) Management Information Base (MIB)", September 2006

Source of RFC: ccamp (rtg)

Errata ID: 39
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-06
Rejected by: Adrian Farrel
Date Rejected: 2007-02-24

Section 7 says:

      In lmpDataLinkTable:
   {

It should say:

   In lmpDataLinkTable:
   {

Notes:

spurious indentation

from pending

--VERIFIER COMMENT--
While many of these comments would undoubtedly have led to a more polished
final RFC it is fortunate that none of them makes the document in any way
harder to read or less technically meaningful. I am sure that if and when
the RFC progresses from Proposed Standard to Draft Standard we can look back
at this list to ensure that your comments are addressed.

In future, however, I would urge you to make comments on the content and
format of CCAMP documents as they progress through the working group or
during IETF last call. Comments made later than that are very unlikely to be
considered by the authors for inclusion, but comments made earlier in the
process are very likely to be included.

Obviously, if issues of technical clarity or understanding do come up later
than this, we can address them through Errata while a new revision of the
RFC is prepared. On the other hand, Errata are probably not well used for
recording small format errors in the text as these are not strictly errors
of content or substance.

Report New Errata