RFC Errata
RFC 5520, "Preserving Topology Confidentiality in Inter-Domain Path Computation Using a Path-Key-Based Mechanism", April 2009
Source of RFC: pce (rtg)See Also: RFC 5520 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 3582
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Dhruv Dhody
Date Reported: 2013-04-05
Verifier Name: Adrian Farrel
Date Verified: 2013-04-10
Section 3.2.3 says:
<request>::= <RP> <segment-computation> | <path-key-expansion> where: <segment-computation> ::= <END-POINTS> [<LSPA>] [<BANDWIDTH>] [<BANDWIDTH>] [<metric-list>] [<RRO>] [<IRO>] [<LOAD-BALANCING>] <path-key-expansion> ::= <PATH-KEY>
It should say:
<request>::= <RP> <segment-computation> | <path-key-expansion> where: <segment-computation> ::= <END-POINTS> [<LSPA>] [<BANDWIDTH>] [<metric-list>] [<RRO>[<BANDWIDTH>]] [<IRO>] [<LOAD-BALANCING>] <path-key-expansion> ::= <PATH-KEY>
Notes:
This document defines <path-key-expansion> to allow path request message to be used for getting the confidential path segment. The <segment-computation> should be as per RFC5440 itself.
There is a mistake in the second BANDWIDTH object which should be placed with RRO as per RFC5440.