RFC Errata
RFC 6550, "RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks", March 2012
Source of RFC: roll (rtg)See Also: RFC 6550 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 3580
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Tony Cheneau
Date Reported: 2013-04-04
Verifier Name: Adrian Farrel
Date Verified: 2013-04-10
Section 9.9.1 says:
1. Let C1 send a DAO containing a Target T with a Path Control 10000000b. Node N stores an entry associating 10000000b with the Path Control field for C1 and Target T. 2. Let C2 send a DAO containing a Target T with a Path Control 00010000b. Node N stores an entry associating 00010000b with the Path Control field for C1 and Target T. 3. Let C3 send a DAO containing a Target T with a Path Control 00001100b. Node N stores an entry associating 00001100b with the Path Control field for C1 and Target T.
It should say:
1. Let C1 send a DAO containing a Target T with a Path Control 10000000b. Node N stores an entry associating 10000000b with the Path Control field for C1 and Target T. 2. Let C2 send a DAO containing a Target T with a Path Control 00010000b. Node N stores an entry associating 00010000b with the Path Control field for C2 and Target T. 3. Let C3 send a DAO containing a Target T with a Path Control 00001100b. Node N stores an entry associating 00001100b with the Path Control field for C3 and Target T.
Notes:
Bullet 2 and 3 seem wrong. I believe "C1" should be replaced by "C2" in bullet 2 and "C1" should be replaced by "C3" in bullet 3.
This issue was initially reported by Federico Consoli on the ROLL WG mailing list.