RFC Errata
RFC 3971, "SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND)", March 2005
Source of RFC: send (int)See Also: RFC 3971 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 3540
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-14
Verifier Name: Ralph Droms
Date Verified: 2013-03-10
Section 6.4.5 says:
Future, backward- | compatible changes to the protocol may specify the contents of the | Reserved field or add new options; backward-incompatible changes may use different Code values.
It should say:
Future, backward- | compatible changes to the protocol MAY specify the contents of the | Reserved field or add new options; backward-incompatible changes MUST use different Code values.
Notes:
Section 6.4.5 vs. Section 6.4.6 -- contradiction!
Contrary to 6.4.5, the first paragraph of Section 6.4.6 says:
Future, backward-
compatible changes to the protocol MAY specify the contents of the
Reserved field or add new options; backward-incompatible changes MUST
use different Code values.
I suspect that the first "may" above should be a "MAY" and the second
"may" should have been a "MUST" as well.
If that's correct, the first paragraph of Section 6.4.5 should be corrected as above.