RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 4447, "Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)", April 2006

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 8077

Source of RFC: pwe3 (int)

Errata ID: 3111
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-09
Rejected by: Stewart Bryant
Date Rejected: 2012-02-07

Section 6.3 says:

a) The first paragraph of Section 6.3, on page 22, says:

   As mentioned above, the Group ID field of the PWid FEC element, or
   the PW Grouping ID TLV used with the Generalized ID FEC element, can
   be used to withdraw all PW labels associated with a particular PW
   group.  [...]

It should say:

   As mentioned above, the Group ID field of the PWid FEC element, or
|  the PW Grouping ID TLV used with the Generalized PWid FEC element,
   can be used to withdraw all PW labels associated with a particular PW
   group.  [...]

b) The second paragraph of Section 6.3, on top of page 23, says:

   If the Generalized FEC element is used, the AGI, SAII, and TAII are
   not present, the PW information length field is set to 0, the PW
   Grouping ID TLV is included, the Interface Parameters TLV is not
   present, and the Label TLV is not present.  For the purpose of this
   document, this is called the "wild card withdraw procedure", and all
   PEs implementing this design are REQUIRED to accept such withdrawn
   message but are not required to send it.  Note that the PW Grouping
   ID TLV only applies to PWs using the Generalized ID FEC element,
   while the Group ID only applies to PWid FEC element.

It should say:

|  If the Generalized PWid FEC element is used, the AGI, SAII, and TAII
   are not present, the PW information length field is set to 0, the PW
   Grouping ID TLV is included, the Interface Parameters TLV is not
   present, and the Label TLV is not present.  For the purpose of this
   document, this is called the "wild card withdraw procedure", and all
   PEs implementing this design are REQUIRED to accept such withdrawn
   message but are not required to send it.  Note that the PW Grouping
|  ID TLV only applies to PWs using the Generalized PWid FEC element,
   while the Group ID only applies to PWid FEC element.

Notes:

--VERIFIER NOTES--
The terminology in the RFC is correct.
It is the "generalized PW FEC Element" and not the "generalized PWid FEC element"

Report New Errata