RFC 4992, "XML Pipelining with Chunks for the Internet Registry Information Service", August 2007

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8996

Errata ID: 2835
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-09-09
Held for Document Update by: Pete Resnick
Date Held: 2011-06-11

Section 14.1 says:

      Anonymous client access SHOULD be considered in one of two
      methods:

It should say:

   Anonymous client access SHOULD be considered in one of two methods:

Notes:

Near the bottom of page 17, the paragraph introducing the list of
numbered items is indented too much.

[Separating into individual errata from 1009]

Report New Errata