RFC Errata
RFC 5661, "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol", January 2010
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 8881
Source of RFC: nfsv4 (tsv)See Also: RFC 5661 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 2062
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Peter Varga
Date Reported: 2010-03-04
Verifier Name: Lars Eggert
Date Verified: 2011-03-07
Section 2.10.6.1.3 says:
A reply that consists only of the Sequence operation with the error NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY. When the replier detects a false retry, it is permitted (but not always obligated) to return NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY... If the replier determines the users are different between the original request and a retry, then the replier MUST return NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY. ...current minor version (e.g., SETCLIENTID), the replier MAY return NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY... The difference is due to NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY being a valid error for only Sequence operations...
It should say:
A reply that consists only of the Sequence operation with the error NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY. When the replier detects a false retry, it is permitted (but not always obligated) to return NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY... If the replier determines the users are different between the original request and a retry, then the replier MUST return NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY. ...current minor version (e.g., SETCLIENTID), the replier MAY return NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY... The difference is due to NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY being a valid error for only Sequence operations...
Notes:
References to NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY instead of NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY