RFC 4238, "Voice Message Routing Service", October 2005Source of RFC: vpim (app)
See Also: RFC 4238 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 155
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2005-11-30
Verifier Name: Alexey Melnikov
Date Verified: 2009-07-18
Section 5 says:
This specification registers the E2U+VPIM and E2U+Voice services according to the specifications and guidelines in RFC 3761 [ENUM] and the definitions in this document.
It should say:
This specification registers the E2U+VPIM:LDAP and E2U+VPIM:Mailto services according to the specifications and guidelines in RFC 3761 [ENUM] and the definitions in this document.
[Note: The RFC text uses "<uri_schema_name>" vs. "<uri_schema_name>:"
in a non-systematical manner. I suspect the difference is not meant to
be significant in the text. Systematical usage of only one of these
two styles would be preferrable in derived (and other future) work.
I have intentionally omitted the trailing ":" after "Mailto" above.]