RFC Errata
RFC 5117, "RTP Topologies", January 2008
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 7667
Source of RFC: avt (rai)
Errata ID: 1313
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-02-13
Held for Document Update by: Cullen Jennings
Section 3.3,pg.7 says:
[...]. Therefore, if the Receiver Reports were forwarded without changes, the extended highest sequence number would indicate that B were substantially behind in reception, while it most | likely it would not be. [...] ^^^^
It should say:
[...]. Therefore, if the Receiver Reports were forwarded without changes, the extended highest sequence number would indicate that B were substantially behind in reception, while it most | likely would not be. [...] ^
Notes:
Spurious word replication; location is 4th-to-last line on page 7.