RFC 5117, "RTP Topologies", January 2008

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 7667

Errata ID: 1313
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-02-13
Held for Document Update by: Cullen Jennings

Section 3.3,pg.7 says:

                    [...].  Therefore, if the Receiver Reports were
   forwarded without changes, the extended highest sequence number would
   indicate that B were substantially behind in reception, while it most
|  likely it would not be.  [...]
         ^^^^

It should say:

                    [...].  Therefore, if the Receiver Reports were
   forwarded without changes, the extended highest sequence number would
   indicate that B were substantially behind in reception, while it most
|  likely would not be.  [...]
         ^

Notes:

Spurious word replication; location is 4th-to-last line on page 7.

Report New Errata