RFC 5088, "OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery", January 2008

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 9353

Errata ID: 1267
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-01-13
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel

Section 9.6, line 1 says:

         ... PCED TLV, may have ...

It should say:

         ... PCED TLV may have ...

Notes:

Spurious comma, distorting the grammar.

>>> This issue is not present in the equivalent text of
RFC 5089, which has been published together with this RFC.

This report is primarily intended as a kind of quality control feedback.

Another typographical flaw of similar 'severity' appears in Section 11.2,
where punctuation has been orphaned into the 3rd line of the '[PCEP]'
entry:

[PCEP] Vasseur, JP., Ed., and JL. Le Roux, Ed., "Path
Computation Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP)
| ", Work in Progress, November 2007.
^^

>>> This latter issue also is present in RFC 5089.
and perhaps does not deserve

Report New Errata