This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
webfeedback [2015/10/08 16:33] rsewikiadmin Added items 26 through 29 |
webfeedback [2015/10/13 14:29] (current) rsewikiadmin |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
^7 | The rfc errata summary table doesn' | ^7 | The rfc errata summary table doesn' | ||
^ 8 | re clicking on “Browse RFCs by Status” & Best Current Practice I get a randomized list of 25 BCPs. it would seem to me that if the title is “Browse RFCs by Status” _ would get all the BCPs (or maybe the 1st 25) in order the same is true for the other categories as well | Investigating | | ^ 8 | re clicking on “Browse RFCs by Status” & Best Current Practice I get a randomized list of 25 BCPs. it would seem to me that if the title is “Browse RFCs by Status” _ would get all the BCPs (or maybe the 1st 25) in order the same is true for the other categories as well | Investigating | | ||
- | ^9 | re: clicking on Official Internet Protocol Standards. I get an ordered list of internet standards some of which are missing (e.g. STD 1 & STD 2) and some of which show up in more than one box (e.g., STD 5 & 13) seems like this needs more work imo - all std #s should appear once (even to say “not issued”) and only once & include all the RFCs that make up a STD the current format makes it hard to say what STD 13 (for example) consists of | There is an option to show/hide retired STD numbers; current default is to hide. Will switch | + | ^9 | re: clicking on Official Internet Protocol Standards. I get an ordered list of internet standards some of which are missing (e.g. STD 1 & STD 2) and some of which show up in more than one box (e.g., STD 5 & 13) seems like this needs more work imo - all std #s should appear once (even to say “not issued”) and only once & include all the RFCs that make up a STD the current format makes it hard to say what STD 13 (for example) consists of | There is an option to show/hide retired STD numbers; current default is to hide. After further discussion, will leave as is and add more text to indicate what can be shown | |
^10 | re: RFC Status Changes. this is incomplete- e.g. RFC 1058 is missing | ^10 | re: RFC Status Changes. this is incomplete- e.g. RFC 1058 is missing | ||
^11 | Serving up your own version of jQuery, Reponsive Menu, and so on instead of using the widely-cached ones means that if there are security bugs found in them (which there are), you will continue to serve the buggy versions long after the bugs have been fixed. | WordPress default. Will investigate using public version post-cutover. | | ^11 | Serving up your own version of jQuery, Reponsive Menu, and so on instead of using the widely-cached ones means that if there are security bugs found in them (which there are), you will continue to serve the buggy versions long after the bugs have been fixed. | WordPress default. Will investigate using public version post-cutover. | | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
^16 | The Internet Society logo appears too far beneath " | ^16 | The Internet Society logo appears too far beneath " | ||
^17 | FF (with noscript) reports mixed content just to left of lock icon | Investigating | | ^17 | FF (with noscript) reports mixed content just to left of lock icon | Investigating | | ||
- | ^18 | ISSN is too prominent for my tastes | Willfix | + | ^18 | ISSN is too prominent for my tastes | Fixed | |
^19 | RFC1984/ | ^19 | RFC1984/ | ||
- | ^20 | IETF, IRTF and IAB could usefully be links as the ISE is | Reviewing links and locations | + | ^20 | IETF, IRTF and IAB could usefully be links as the ISE is | Won't fix; anecdotal evidence suggests more people are familiar with "IETF than " |
^21 | Errata verification login didn't carry over for me, probably my browser' | ^21 | Errata verification login didn't carry over for me, probably my browser' | ||
- | ^22 | Chrome on the iPhone worked too, but took a good 10 seconds to respond. | Investigating | | + | ^22 | Chrome on the iPhone worked too, but took a good 10 seconds to respond. | Investigating; not enough information |
^23 | My only nit is that whoever designed the look is too much in love with gray boxes and grey shadows... | Holding off on the color conversation. | | ^23 | My only nit is that whoever designed the look is too much in love with gray boxes and grey shadows... | Holding off on the color conversation. | | ||
- | ^24 | The grey box in the middle makes it hard to read the text. Lightening it would help a lot. | Willfix | + | ^24 | The grey box in the middle makes it hard to read the text. Lightening it would help a lot. | Won't fix | |
^25 | One comment though on the " | ^25 | One comment though on the " | ||
^26 | Re: errata page - The text is all shown in a grey background block in the middle of the page, which is fine, but for some reason when there' | ^26 | Re: errata page - The text is all shown in a grey background block in the middle of the page, which is fine, but for some reason when there' | ||
^27 | Much the same issue (as with item 26, re: errata page) with the cluster pages. | ^27 | Much the same issue (as with item 26, re: errata page) with the cluster pages. | ||
- | ^28 | My $0.02, ditch the grey background! | + | ^28 | My $0.02, ditch the grey background! |
^29 | The new site looks good, except for one thing -- the drop-shadow border around the content. It's visually jarring and doesn' | ^29 | The new site looks good, except for one thing -- the drop-shadow border around the content. It's visually jarring and doesn' | ||
+ | ^30 | Define 404 as TBD pages, e.g. redirect to a " |