[rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri Mar 27 15:03:39 PDT 2020


On 27-Mar-20 16:48, Joseph Touch wrote:
...
>>>
>>> Draft-tsvwg-udp-options - does what?
>>> 	- it extends UDP with options
>>> 	- but it also alters UDP to prohibit UDP length values that 786 allows
>>>
>>> Is that extends or emends?
>>
>> Both. Why would it be a problem to use both tags if they both apply?
> 
> What’s the point? Why the nuance?

Personally, I don't think that the difference between:
"You need to write some new code."
and
"You need go and fix your old code."
is just a nuance. Product managers may view these as two totally
different matters with different business implications.

    Brian  




More information about the rfc-interest mailing list