[rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

Mark Nottingham mnot at mnot.net
Wed Mar 25 18:02:11 PDT 2020



> On 26 Mar 2020, at 11:56 am, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> But, if that were worth discussing, it'd challenge a
> very fundamental tenet of the RFC series, and would
> surely therefore be worth at least it's own thread
> where you or someone would collate and present your
> evidence in some detail?

Because I have limited time to devote to this, and it's just an idea. If you don't like it, fine, but don't discard it because I don't meet your arbitrary bar for how to engage.

Thanks,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list