[rfc-i] [Ietf-and-github] RFC Editor & Github

Eric Rescorla ekr at rtfm.com
Fri Feb 22 10:32:42 PST 2019

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:55 AM Bret Jordan <jordan.ietf at gmail.com> wrote:

> <inline>
> Thanks,
> Bret
> PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
> "Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that
> can not be unscrambled is an egg."
> On Feb 21, 2019, at 7:25 PM, Martin J. Dürst <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
> wrote:
> On 2019/02/22 07:06, Mike Bishop wrote:
> Ideally, I'd see AUTH48 as a PR (perhaps from a private repo). One of the
> things we'll need to work out is to what extent that's feasible for the RFC
> Editor.
> I'm of course not in any way speaking for the RFC Editor. Also, I'm
> myself still struggling with git and github, so I don't want to push
> (sic) it on anybody else.
> I like git for source code work, but I am still having a hard time using
> it for document work. The number of extra steps and the learning curve can
> be just hard for people.  Also, the difference between authoring and
> editing are huge and pushing this on people that are not super familiar
> with Git can be a show stopper.
> The goal of this WG, IMHO, is to document how we can make this easy for
> people so we can get MORE people involved in reading, working on, and
> contributing to the work we do here in the IETF not less.  If we make a
> solution that drives people away, and our overall attrition rate continues
> to go up, then we become less and less relevant over time.

No, I don't think so. The goal of this WG is to streamline the existing
workflows that people are already using and have already determined to be
convenient for their use cases. You may think that that's less convenient,
but that's not really a discussion for the GIT WG.


> Bret
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-and-github mailing list
> Ietf-and-github at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20190222/b45ba29d/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list