[rfc-i] [Ietf-and-github] RFC Editor & Github

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Thu Feb 21 18:41:27 PST 2019


> But compared to the OLD-NEW style of talking about diffs, pull requests 
> are way more precise,

Really? I absolutely don't understand that assertion. 

Regards
   Brian

On 2019-02-22 15:25, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> On 2019/02/22 07:06, Mike Bishop wrote:
>> Ideally, I'd see AUTH48 as a PR (perhaps from a private repo). One of the things we'll need to work out is to what extent that's feasible for the RFC Editor.
> 
> I'm of course not in any way speaking for the RFC Editor. Also, I'm 
> myself still struggling with git and github, so I don't want to push 
> (sic) it on anybody else.
> 
> But I think it would be highly beneficial for the RFC Editor to try to 
> slowly move to (also use) git(hub). They may take quite some time 
> because they have other things on their plate, and have to make sure 
> they move carefully, and establish a process that works for them.
> 
> But compared to the OLD-NEW style of talking about diffs, pull requests 
> are way more precise, and that's what matters for their work. If they 
> can reduce the number of hickups in the back-and-forth with the editors 
> in Auth48, that may help them quite a bit.
> 
> Regards,   Martin.
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> .
> 



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list