[rfc-i] [Rsoc] New proposal/New SOW comment period

Christian Huitema huitema at huitema.net
Sat Aug 31 09:06:50 PDT 2019


> On Aug 31, 2019, at 8:28 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf at elandsys.com> wrote:
> Hi Rich,
> At 07:50 AM 31-08-2019, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> I tend to agree.  Does short-term and longer-term make more sense?
> The duration of the contract is described under "contract period".  It is also stated that this is a temporary position.  A person would likely read as that as not for a longer term, i.e short term.

The intent behind the tactical word or  the proposed short term replacement is to qualify the impact of the work, not its timing. The contractor will drive matters that have short term effect, but will not be making decisions about the long term evolution of the RFC series.

-- Christian Huitema

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list