[rfc-i] artwork width in v3?
mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca
Thu Aug 29 07:42:47 PDT 2019
Kent Watsen <kent+ietf at watsen.net> wrote:
>> I *thought* that we discussed relaxing that limit (to ~90)? Is my
>> recollection incorrect?
> With PDF-output, a smaller font could be used, but how would ~90 chars
> work in the plain-text output?
I wouldn't want to do that.
> Perhaps, in conjunction with the artwork-folding draft, currently in
> IESG Last Call?
This seems like a totally reasonable thing to do, and to teach xml2rfc
to do automatically when generating .txt format documents.
Seems odd for this to be in the netmod WG though :-)
But, I can see why you guys need it.
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the rfc-interest