[rfc-i] artwork width in v3?

Michael Richardson mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca
Thu Aug 29 07:42:47 PDT 2019


Kent Watsen <kent+ietf at watsen.net> wrote:
    >> I *thought* that we discussed relaxing that limit (to ~90)? Is my
    >> recollection incorrect?

    > With PDF-output, a smaller font could be used, but how would ~90 chars
    > work in the plain-text output?

I wouldn't want to do that.

    > Perhaps, in conjunction with the artwork-folding draft, currently in
    > IESG Last Call?
    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding
    > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding>

This seems like a totally reasonable thing to do, and to teach xml2rfc
to do automatically when generating .txt format documents.
Seems odd for this to be in the netmod WG though :-)
But, I can see why you guys need it.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20190829/60328838/attachment.asc>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list