[rfc-i] V3 vocabulary and BCP 14 language
mcr at sandelman.ca
Thu Aug 22 12:32:49 PDT 2019
Jim Schaad <ietf at augustcellars.com> wrote:
> When one places the BCP 14 template text into a document, are the BCP
I first read this query as being, by act of pasting the BCP14 text in, that
xml2rfc would magically change "MUST" into <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>.
I thought that would be neat, but it can't be what you are asking.
AFAIK, there is no <bcp14 type="MUST" /> markup.
> 14 keywords supposed to be wrapped in the bcp14 element from the
> xml2rfc vocabulary or not? I can see arguments on both sides of this
> so I don't think that I have a personal opinion.
I think that they <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>.
I am in favour of more meta markup.
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr at sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
More information about the rfc-interest